Premium
Facies, cycles, and controls on the evolution of a keep‐up carbonate platform (Kimmeridgian, Swiss Jura)
Author(s) -
COLOMBIÉ CLAUDE,
STRASSER ANDRE
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
sedimentology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.494
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1365-3091
pISSN - 0037-0746
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2005.00736.x
Subject(s) - geology , facies , marine transgression , paleontology , sedimentary depositional environment , carbonate platform , sedimentary rock , structural basin , sea level , ammonite , carbonate , sequence stratigraphy , shoal , geomorphology , oceanography , cretaceous , materials science , metallurgy
During the Late Jurassic, accelerated ocean‐floor spreading and associated sea‐level rise were responsible for a worldwide transgression, which reached its maximum in the Late Kimmeridgian. In many Western European basins, this major sea‐level rise led to the formation of marly and condensed sections. In the Swiss Jura, however, a shallow carbonate platform kept growing and only subtle changes in the stratigraphic record suggest an increasingly open‐marine influence. Field observations and thin‐section analyses reveal that the central Swiss Jura was at that time occupied by tidal flats and by more or less open marine lagoons where shoals and bioherms developed. The evolution through time of sedimentary facies and bed thicknesses permits the definition of small‐, medium‐, and large‐scale depositional sequences. The diagnostic features of these sequences are independent of scale and seem largely controlled by the Kimmeridgian second‐order transgression. A high‐resolution sequence‐stratigraphic correlation with biostratigraphically well‐dated hemipelagic and pelagic sections in the Vocontian Basin in France reveals that: (i) The most important increase in accommodation recorded in the Kimmeridgian of the central Swiss Jura occurs in the Eudoxus ammonite zone (Late Kimmeridgian) and corresponds to the second‐order maximum flooding recognized in many sedimentary basins. (ii) The small‐ and medium‐scale sequences have time durations corresponding to the first and second orbital eccentricity cycle (i.e. 100 and 400 ka, respectively), suggesting that sedimentation on the platform and in the basin was at least partly controlled by cyclic environmental changes induced by insolation variations in the Milankovitch frequency band. The comparison of the high‐resolution temporal framework defined in the Swiss Jura and Vocontian Basin with the sequence‐stratigraphic interpretation realized in other Western European basins shows that the large‐scale sequence boundaries defined in the Kimmeridgian of the Swiss Jura appear in comparable biostratigraphic positions in most Western European basins. Discrepancies that occur are probably because of local or regional tectonics.