z-logo
Premium
Estimating stomatal conductance with thermal imagery
Author(s) -
LEIN I.,
GRANT O. M.,
TAGLIAVIA C. P. P.,
CHAVES M. M.,
JONES H. G.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01528.x
Subject(s) - stomatal conductance , environmental science , materials science , atmospheric sciences , geology , chemistry , photosynthesis , biochemistry
Most thermal methods for the study of drought responses in plant leaves are based on the calculation of ‘stress indices’. This paper proposes and compares three main extensions of these for the direct estimation of absolute values of stomatal conductance to water vapour ( g s ) using infrared thermography (IRT). All methods use the measured leaf temperature and two environmental variables (air temperature and boundary layer resistance) as input. Additional variables required, depending on the method, are the temperatures of wet and dry reference surfaces, net radiation and relative humidity. The methods were compared using measured g s data from a vineyard in Southern Portugal. The errors in thermal estimates of conductance were of the same order as the measurement errors using a porometer. Observed variability was also compared with theoretical estimates of errors in estimated g s determined on the basis of the errors in the input variables (leaf temperature, boundary layer resistance, net radiation) and the partial derivatives of the energy balance equations used for the g s calculations. The full energy balance approach requires accurate estimates of net radiation absorbed, which may not be readily available in field conditions, so alternatives using reference surfaces are shown to have advantages. A new approach using a dry reference leaf is particularly robust and recommended for those studies where the specific advantages of thermal imagery, including its non‐contact nature and its ability to sample large numbers of leaves, are most apparent. Although the results suggest that estimates of the absolute magnitude of g s are somewhat subjective, depending on the skill of the experimenter at selecting evenly exposed leaves, relative treatment differences in conductance are sensitively detected by different experimenters.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here