z-logo
Premium
Dynamics of stomatal water relations following leaf excision
Author(s) -
POWLES JULIA E.,
BUCKLEY THOMAS N.,
NICOTRA ADRIENNE B.,
FARQUHAR GRAHAM D.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01491.x
Subject(s) - dynamics (music) , environmental science , biology , horticulture , psychology , pedagogy
We examined the stomatal response to leaf excision in an evergreen woody shrub, Photinia  ×  fraseri , using a novel combination of gas exchange, traditional water relations and modelling. Plants were kept outdoors in mild winter conditions (average daily temperature range: −1 to 12 °C) before being transferred to a glasshouse (temperature range: 20–30 °C) and allowed to acclimate for different periods before experiments. ‘Glasshouse plants’ were acclimated for at least 9 d, and ‘outdoor plants’ were acclimated for fewer than 3 d before laboratory gas exchange experiments. The transient stomatal opening response to leaf excision was roughly twice as long in outdoor plants as in glasshouse plants. To elucidate the reason for this difference, we inferred variables of stomatal water relations (epidermal and guard cell turgor pressures and guard cell osmotic pressure: P e , P g and π g , respectively) from stomatal conductance ( g s ) and bulk leaf water potential ( ψ l ), using a hydromechanical model of g s . ψ l was calculated from cumulative post‐excision transpirational water loss using empirical relationships between ψ l and relative water content obtained on similar leaves. Inferred P g and P e both declined immediately after leaf excision. Inferred π g also declined after a lag period. The kinetics of π g adjustment after the lag were similar in outdoors and glasshouse plants, but the lag period was much longer in outdoor plants. This suggests that the longer transient opening response in outdoor plants resulted from slower induction, not slower execution, of guard cell osmoregulation. We discuss the implications of our results for the mechanism of short‐term stomatal responses to hydraulic perturbations, for dynamic modelling of g s and for leaf water status regulation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here