Premium
Interpretation of the electrical potential on the surface of plant roots
Author(s) -
DUE G.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00897.x
Subject(s) - measure (data warehouse) , microelectrode , membrane potential , surface (topology) , biological system , stele , rhizosphere , point (geometry) , mathematics , physics , biophysics , geometry , botany , computer science , biology , electrode , genetics , bacteria , quantum mechanics , database
The electrical potential difference (p.d.) between two points on the surface of a plant root is shown to be a measure of the difference between the transmembrane potentials at those two points. More precisely, it is shown that axial differences in electrical potential on the surface of the root, or within several tenths of millimeters of it in the rhizosphere, are primarily a result of axial differences in p.d. across the plasmalemma of cells in the cortex, with an additional small effect from axial differences in p.d. across the plasmalemma of cells in the stele. This conclusion results from a model of the root as a three‐conductor electrical transmission line. The model requires the solution of a set of differential equations, but simple algebraic approximations are found to apply over a range of model parameters derived from published data. Given the predictions of the model, it follows that, for many research purposes, microelectrode measurements could be replaced with measurements of p.d. on the surface of the root. Such measurements offer substantial advantages over microelectrode measurements: they are non‐invasive; they do not include the potential difference across the tonoplast; they measure a spatial average of many cells, not just a single cell; and the measurement is physically robust. Surface potential measurements do not, however, measure trans‐membrane potential at one point, but measure differences in trans‐membrane potential.