Premium
Growth and onto‐morphogenesis of soybean ( Glycine max Merril) in an open, naturally CO 2 ‐enriched environment
Author(s) -
MIGLIETTA F.,
RASCHI A.,
RESTI R.,
BADIANI M.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00514.x
Subject(s) - carbon dioxide , biomass (ecology) , glycine , nitrogen , methane , horticulture , carbon dioxide in earth's atmosphere , botany , carbon fibers , chemistry , biology , zoology , agronomy , biochemistry , amino acid , materials science , ecology , organic chemistry , composite number , composite material
Springs emitting carbon dioxide are frequent in Central Italy and provide a way of testing the response of plants to CO 2 enrichment under natural conditions. Results of a CO 2 enrichment experiment on soybean at a CO 2 spring (Solfatara) are presented. The experimental site is characterized by significant anomalies in atmospheric CO 2 concentration produced by a large number of vents emitting almost pure CO 2 (93%) plus small amounts of hydrogen sulphide, methane, nitrogen and oxygen. Within the gas vent area, plants were grown at three sub‐areas whose mean CO 2 concentrations during daytime were 350,652 and 2370 μmol mol ‐1 , respectively. Weekly harvests were made to measure biomass growth, leaf area and ontogenetic development. Biomass growth rate and seed yield were enhanced by elevated CO 2 . In particular, onto‐morphogenetic development was affected by elevated CO 2 with high levels of CO 2 increasing the total number of main stem leaf nodes and the area of the main stem trifoliolate leaves. Biochemical analysis of plant tissue suggested that there was no effect of the small amounts of H 2 S on the response to CO 2 enrichment. Non‐protein sulphydryl compounds did not accumulate in leaf tissues and the overall capacity of leaf extracts to oxidize exogenously added NADH was not decreased. The limitations and advantages of experimenting with crop plants at elevated CO 2 in the open and in the proximity of carbon dioxide springs are discussed.