Premium
Zeta potential measurements of cell wall preparations from Regnellidium diphyllum and Nymphoides peltata
Author(s) -
O'SHEA P.,
WALTERS J.,
RIDGE I.,
WAINRIGHT M.,
TRINCI A. P. J.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1990.tb01321.x
Subject(s) - zeta potential , electric field , electrophoresis , cell wall , surface charge , electric potential , charge density , biophysics , chemistry , chromatography , botany , biology , nanotechnology , materials science , voltage , physics , quantum mechanics , nanoparticle
. Cell wall particles were prepared from the semi‐aquatic plants Regnellidium diphyllum and Nymphoides peltata with minimum disruption to the integrity of the cell wall. The behaviour of freshly‐prepared and frozen‐thawed particles in a D.C. electric field was monitored with a microscope attached to video recording apparatus. From the respective particles mobility in a well‐defined electric field. it was possible to determine their electrostatic potential and consequently estimate the corresponding surface charge density. Experiments were performed in media of different pH and cation concentration (ie, K + Ca 2+ ). A significant electronegative potential was found in cell wall preparations of both plants. Freezing and thawing further reduced the electrostatic potential for both plant species in all the media utilized for electrophoresis. A reduction of pH or an increase of the cation concentration was found to neutralize the electrostatic potential in a sigmoidal fashion. Ca 2+ was more than 10 times more effective than K + at neutralizing the apparent electrostatic potential of the cell wall preparations. Regnellidium was found to have a lower electrostatic potential than Nymphoides , although both responded in a similar manner to the various treatments. The possible relevance of the cell wall electrostatic potential, pH and [Ca 2+ ] and particularly their inter‐relationship is discussed for the two species of plants in terms of their differing growth responses to the ionic environment of the plant.