Premium
Costly sexual harassment in a beetle
Author(s) -
GAY LAURÉNE,
EADY PAUL E.,
VASUDEV RAM,
HOSKEN DAVID J.,
TREGENZA TOM
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
physiological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.693
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1365-3032
pISSN - 0307-6962
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2008.00656.x
Subject(s) - biology , sexual conflict , mating , harassment , context (archaeology) , sexual selection , antagonistic coevolution , zoology , callosobruchus maculatus , offspring , demography , reproductive success , mate choice , ecology , population , pest analysis , pregnancy , genetics , social psychology , botany , psychology , paleontology , sociology
The optimal number of mating partners for females rarely coincides with that for males, leading to sexual conflict over mating frequency. In the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus , the fitness consequences to females of engaging in multiple copulations are complex, with studies demonstrating both costs and benefits to multiple mating. However, females kept continuously with males have a lower lifetime egg production compared with females mated only once and then isolated from males. This reduction in fitness may be a result of damage caused by male genitalia, which bear spines that puncture the female’s reproductive tract, and/or toxic elements in the ejaculate. However, male harassment rather than costs of matings themselves could also explain the results. In the present study, the fitness costs of male harassment for female C. maculatus are estimated. The natural refractory period of females immediately after their first mating is used to separate the cost of harassment from the cost of mating. Male harassment results in females laying fewer eggs and this results in a tendency to produce fewer offspring. The results are discussed in the context of mate choice and sexual selection.