Premium
Differentiation of roles of chemosensory organs in food discrimination among host and non‐host plants by larvae of the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta
Author(s) -
BOER GERRIT DE,
HANSON FRANK E.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
physiological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.693
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1365-3032
pISSN - 0307-6962
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1987.tb00765.x
Subject(s) - biology , manduca sexta , sphingidae , host (biology) , canna , lycopersicon , olfaction , lepidoptera genitalia , larva , chemoreceptor , sensillum , olfactometer , botany , manduca , anatomy , zoology , ecology , food science , biochemistry , receptor , starch
. The contributions of olfactory and gustatory organs in food plant discrimination were examined in larvae of Manduca sexta (Johan.) (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Larvae, from which various chemosensory organs had been removed surgically, were tested for feeding preferences for a host, tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum ); a weakly acceptable non‐host, rape ( Brassica napus ); and an unacceptable non‐host canna ( Canna generalis ), using a two‐choice disc bioassay. Removal of all known chemosensory organs resulted in failure to show discriminatory behaviour in a strictly chemosensory bioassay, indicating that all external chemosensory organs have been accounted for. The involvement of non‐chemosensory organs results in residual discrimination for leaves by individuals with total chemosensory ablations. Larvae possessing either olfactory or gustatory organs still exhibit normal preferences for tomato over rape. Gustatory (but not olfactory) organs are required for larvae to show normal preferences for tomato over canna; in fact, olfactory organs do not appear to participate in this decision. To examine which if any of the plant species is being selected in two‐choice tests, larvae were given a choice between each leaf species and a ‘neutral’ substance (wet filter paper). Both olfactory and gustatory organs are required for normal preferences for tomato, but either alone will suffice for rape. Only gustation is needed to select canna, and participation of either the epipharyngeal sensilla or a single medial sensillum styloconicum is sufficient to elicit complete rejection behaviour. We conclude that, in larvae of M. sexta , the complement of chemosensory organs needed for food plant discrimination varies with the plant species sampled. Evidence is presented exposing a potential artefact of ablation experiments; extirpation of one sensory organ may affect the functioning of others nearby, even though they may appear normal by visual inspection.