Premium
The RGS protein Crg2 regulates both pheromone and cAMP signalling in Cryptococcus neoformans
Author(s) -
Xue Chaoyang,
Hsueh YenPing,
Chen Lydia,
Heitman Joseph
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06417.x
Subject(s) - biology , g protein , microbiology and biotechnology , cryptococcus neoformans , gtpase activating protein , virulence , mating , signal transduction , genetics , g protein coupled receptor , gene
Summary G proteins orchestrate critical cellular functions by transducing extracellular signals into internal signals and controlling cellular responses to environmental cues. G proteins typically function as switches that are activated by G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) and negatively controlled by regulator of G protein signalling (RGS) proteins. In the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans , three G protein α subunits (Gpa1, Gpa2 and Gpa3) have been identified. In a previous study, we identified the RGS protein Crg2 involved in regulating the pheromone response pathway through Gpa2 and Gpa3. In this study, a role for Crg2 was established in the Gpa1‐cAMP signalling pathway that governs mating and virulence. We show that Crg2 physically interacts with Gpa1 and crg2 mutations increase cAMP production. crg2 mutations also enhance mating filament hyphae production, but reduce cell–cell fusion and sporulation efficiency during mating. Although crg2 mutations and the Gpa1 dominant active allele GPA1 Q284L enhanced melanin production under normally repressive conditions, virulence was attenuated in a murine model. We conclude that Crg2 participates in controlling both Gpa1‐cAMP‐virulence and pheromone‐mating signalling cascades and hypothesize it may serve as a molecular interface between these two central signalling conduits.