z-logo
Premium
Messenger RNA interferase RelE controls relBE transcription by conditional cooperativity
Author(s) -
Overgaard Martin,
Borch Jonas,
Jørgensen Mikkel G.,
Gerdes Kenn
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06313.x
Subject(s) - operon , biology , transcription (linguistics) , repressor , relb , antitoxin , cooperativity , transcription factor , general transcription factor , genetics , cooperative binding , operator (biology) , microbiology and biotechnology , binding site , promoter , gene , escherichia coli , toxin , gene expression , nfkb1 , linguistics , philosophy
Summary Prokaryotic toxin–antitoxin (TA) loci consist of two genes in an operon that encodes a metabolically stable toxin and an unstable antitoxin. The antitoxin neutralizes its cognate toxin by forming a tight complex with it. In all cases known, the antitoxin autoregulates TA operon transcription by binding to one or more operators in the promoter region while the toxin functions as a co‐repressor of transcription. Interestingly, the toxin can also stimulate TA operon transcription. Here we analyse mechanistic aspects of how RelE of Escherichia coli can function both as a co‐repressor and as a derepressor of relBE transcription. When RelB was in excess to RelE, two trimeric RelB 2 •RelE complexes bound cooperatively to two adjacent operator sites in the relBE promoter region and repressed transcription. In contrast, RelE in excess stimulated relBE transcription and released the RelB 2 •RelE complex from operator DNA. A mutational analysis of the operator sites showed that RelE in excess counteracted cooperative binding of the RelB 2 •RelE complexes to the operator sites. Thus, RelE controls relBE transcription by conditional cooperativity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here