Premium
Phylogeography of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon : a genome‐wide view
Author(s) -
HUANG PU,
MOLINA JEANMAIRE,
FLOWERS JONATHAN M.,
RUBINSTEIN SAMARA,
JACKSON SCOTT A.,
PURUGGANAN MICHAEL D.,
SCHAAL BARBARA A.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
molecular ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.619
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1365-294X
pISSN - 0962-1083
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05625.x
Subject(s) - oryza rufipogon , biology , domestication , introgression , phylogeography , japonica , evolutionary biology , oryza sativa , microsatellite , range (aeronautics) , phylogenetic tree , oryza , botany , genetics , allele , gene , materials science , composite material
Abstract Asian wild rice ( Oryza rufipogon ) that ranges widely across the eastern and southern part of Asia is recognized as the direct ancestor of cultivated Asian rice ( O. sativa ). Studies of the geographic structure of O. rufipogon , based on chloroplast and low‐copy nuclear markers, reveal a possible phylogeographic signal of subdivision in O. rufipogon . However, this signal of geographic differentiation is not consistently observed among different markers and studies, with often conflicting results. To more precisely characterize the phylogeography of O. rufipogon populations, a genome‐wide survey of unlinked markers, intensively sampled from across the entire range of O. rufipogon is critical. In this study, we surveyed sequence variation at 42 genome‐wide sequence tagged sites (STS) in 108 O. rufipogon accessions from throughout the native range of the species. Using Bayesian clustering, principal component analysis and amova , we conclude that there are two genetically distinct O. rufipogon groups, Ruf‐I and Ruf‐II. The two groups exhibit a clinal variation pattern generally from north‐east to south‐west. Different from many earlier studies, Ruf‐I, which is found mainly in China and the Indochinese Peninsula, shows genetic similarity with one major cultivated rice variety, O. satvia indica , whereas Ruf‐II, mainly from South Asia and the Indochinese Peninsula, is not found to be closely related to cultivated rice varieties. The other major cultivated rice variety, O. sativa japonica , is not found to be similar to either O. rufipogon groups. Our results support the hypothesis of a single origin of the domesticated O. sativa in China. The possible role of palaeoclimate, introgression and migration–drift balance in creating this clinal variation pattern is also discussed.