z-logo
Premium
Estimating population size of endangered brush‐tailed rock‐wallaby ( Petrogale penicillata ) colonies using faecal DNA
Author(s) -
PIGGOTT M. P.,
BANKS S. C.,
STONE N.,
BANFFY C.,
TAYLOR A. C.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
molecular ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.619
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1365-294X
pISSN - 0962-1083
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02783.x
Subject(s) - biology , population , endangered species , population size , ecology , zoology , minimum viable population , effective population size , habitat , genetic variation , demography , sociology , biochemistry , gene
The brush‐tailed rock‐wallaby ( Petrogale penicillata ) is an endangered species in southeastern Australia and many of the remaining populations are declining. The steep rocky habitat and shy nature of the species make it difficult to obtain data on population parameters such as abundance and recruitment. Faecal pellet counts from scat plots are commonly used to monitor population trends but these are imprecise and difficult to relate to absolute population size. We conducted a noninvasive genetic sampling ‘mark–recapture’ study over a 2‐year period to identify individuals from faecal DNA samples and estimate the population size of four brush‐tailed rock‐wallaby colonies located in Wollemi National Park, New South Wales. Scat plots in rock‐wallaby colonies were used as sample collection points for this study. Two separate population estimates were carried out for three of the colonies to determine if we could detect recruitment and changes in population size. We determined that there was one large colony of an estimated 67 individuals (95% confidence interval: 55–91) and three smaller colonies. Monitoring of the smaller colonies also detected possible population size increases in all three. Our results indicate that faecal DNA analysis may be a promising method for estimating and monitoring population trends in this species particularly when used with a traditional field survey method.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here