Premium
Unannounced standardised patients in real practice: a systematic literature review
Author(s) -
Rethans JanJoost,
Gorter Simone,
Bokken Lonneke,
Morrison Linda
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02689.x
Subject(s) - medline , systematic review , protocol (science) , medicine , consistency (knowledge bases) , alternative medicine , medical physics , inclusion and exclusion criteria , inclusion (mineral) , primary care , family medicine , psychology , computer science , pathology , artificial intelligence , political science , law , social psychology
Background No attempt has been made to give a systematic overview of the innovative use of unannounced or incognito standardised patients. Objective To provide a systematic overview of all published studies with incognito standardised patients assessing doctors in actual practice situations using sound reliable and valid standardised patient methodology. Methods Systematic literature search in Medline, Eric and Psyclit with piloted search terms, followed by retrieving additional papers from reference lists. All papers were scored with a predefined protocol‐sheet using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Forty papers referring to 21 projects with incognito standardised patients were found and described in detail. The majority of studies were conducted in primary care and were descriptive. Discussion There is a need for research on the additional value of the incognito standardised patient methodology and for a consensus on how to report on accuracy and consistency of standardised patients.