Premium
Quality assessment in general practice trainers
Author(s) -
VernooijDassen M J F J,
Ram P M,
Brenninkmeijer W J M,
Franssen L J E,
Bottema B J A M,
Van Der Vleuten C P M,
Grol R P T M
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2000.00662.x
Subject(s) - strengths and weaknesses , competence (human resources) , medical education , curriculum , empathy , medicine , general practice , general knowledge , quality (philosophy) , psychology , family medicine , pedagogy , social psychology , philosophy , epistemology , psychiatry
General practice trainers hold a key position in general practice training, especially through their provision of a role model. Their own competence in general practice care is important in this regard. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether a quality assessment programme could identify the strengths and weaknesses of GP trainers in four main domains of general practice care. Methods The quality assessment programme comprised validated tests on four domains of general practice: general medical knowledge, knowledge of medical‐technical skills, consultation skills and practice management. The criterion for the identification of relative strengths and weaknesses of GP trainers was a variation in the scores of trainers indicating higher and lower scores (strengths and weaknesses) within each domain. Results GP trainers ( n =105) were invited to participate in the study and 90% ( n =94) did so. The variation in scores allowed the indication of strengths and weaknesses. Main strengths were: general medical knowledge of the digestive system; knowledge of medical skills relating to the skin; consultation skills concerning empathy; practice management with regard to accessibility. Main weaknesses were: general medical knowledge of the neurological system; knowledge of the medical/technical skills relating to the endocrine metabolic and nutritional system; consultation skills regarding shared decision making; practice management involving cooperation with staff and other care providers. Discussion This first systematic evaluation of GP trainers identified their strengths and weaknesses. The weaknesses identified will be used in the improvement process as topics for collective improvement in the GP trainers’ general curriculum and in individual learning plans.