Premium
Reliability and feasibility of measuring medical interviewing skills: the revised Maastricht History‐Taking and Advice Checklist
Author(s) -
THIEL J.,
KRAAN H. F.,
VLEUTEN C. P. M.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00055.x
Subject(s) - checklist , inter rater reliability , interview , generalizability theory , reliability (semiconductor) , psychology , medical education , applied psychology , clinical psychology , medicine , rating scale , developmental psychology , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics , political science , law , cognitive psychology
Summary. Medical interviewing skills are integral to good medical care. In order to measure these skills an instrument has been developed, called the Maastricht History‐Taking and Advice Checklist (MAAS). It has been studied with regard to interrater reliability and validity. In this study a revised version of the MAAS (MAAS‐R), a check‐list of concrete interview behaviour, has been investigated concerning feasibility and reliability for examination purposes. Audio‐recordings were obtained of 24 doctors, each interviewing eight different standardized patients. The recordings were independently scored by three general practitioners trained in using the MAAS‐R. The results of generalizability analysis, considering the influences of doctors, cases and raters, are encouraging. In order to overcome case‐specificity feasible and reliable measurement can be accomplished with 8–10 cases in 2–2 1/2 hours of testing time, each case being scored by a different rater. Reliability improves considerably if assessment is restricted to basic interviewing skills.