Premium
Predictors of success in a cohort of medical students
Author(s) -
LIPTON A.,
HUXHAM G. J.,
HAMILTON D.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01011.x
Subject(s) - personality , cohort , medical school , test (biology) , psychology , clinical science , academic achievement , medical science , cohort study , medical education , medicine , clinical psychology , mathematics education , alternative medicine , biology , pathology , social psychology , paleontology , cancer pain
Summary Secondary school results were compared with personality test scores as predictors of achievement in medical school in a study of a cohort of students, using simple correlation and multiple linear regression. The cohort of 151 students completed 28 courses in the 6 years. We have previously reported that the scores obtained could be reduced to five independent factors: ‘physical science’; ‘biological science’; ‘para‐clinical science’; ‘basic clinical science’; and ‘clinical science’. Both secondary school scores and personality test scores correlated with medical school achievement factors, but school scores correlated best with ‘physical’ and ‘biological’ science. Considering secondary school scores, English was the best predictor of ‘clinical science’, physics was the best predictor of ‘basic clinical science’ and scores obtained in physics and languages were better predictors of medical school ‘biological science’ than was school biology. Personality factors were better predictors of ‘biological’, ‘paraclinical’ and ‘clinical science’ than secondary school scores and the combined secondary school score (CSS) was the best predictor of ‘physical science’ and of ‘overall achievement’. We conclude that incorporation of personality measurement with school academic achievement could be of value in selection procedures for applicants for medical school.