Premium
The role of the routine clinical history
Author(s) -
GALE JANET,
MARSDEN P.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb00980.x
Subject(s) - recall , interview , medical education , psychology , significant difference , medical history , medicine , sociology , surgery , cognitive psychology , anthropology
Summary Twenty‐two final‐year clinical medical students, twenty‐two pre‐registration house physicians and twenty‐two post MRCP (U.K.) registrars were studied during the clinical interview by the method of videotape‐stimulated recall. It was found that the course of the clinical interview was determined by three thinking processes. There was no significant difference between the students, house officers and registrars in the extent to which their interviews displayed these thinking processes. Taking all subjects together, however, there was a significant difference in overall frequency of usage of the processes. The results show that students and doctors largely conduct the clinical interview according to either the demands of their own interpretation of the clinical information as it is gathered or the requirements of the routine format but usually by a combination of both. The active role of the interviewer in following his/her own interpretative needs is the most important feature of our findings. The routine enquiry was used by all groups as a failsafe or background search mechanism. Increased knowledge of these thinking processes among students and teachers of medicine may lead to a more realistic and efficient balance in the teaching and learning of the clinical history.