z-logo
Premium
Responses of Anopheles culicifacies sibling species A and B to DDT and HCH in India: implications in malaria control
Author(s) -
SUBBARAO SARALA K.,
VASANTHA K.,
SHARMA V. P.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
medical and veterinary entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.028
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2915
pISSN - 0269-283X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1988.tb00186.x
Subject(s) - anopheles culicifacies , biology , sibling species , malaria , vector (molecular biology) , anopheles , ecology , toxicology , veterinary medicine , immunology , medicine , recombinant dna , biochemistry , gene
. Differential responses of Anopheles culicifacies Giles sibling species A and B to DDT were evident from higher survival rate of species B in laboratory bioassays and greater proportions of species B in DDT‐sprayed villages of northern India, compared with those under HCH pressure. Both species A and B have become almost completely resistant to HCH in this area due to regular house‐spraying with HCH for about the last 10 years. Because species A predominates in northern India, where it has been incriminated as an important vector of malaria, and species A is more susceptible than species B to DDT, it is suggested that DDT would control malaria transmission more effectively than HCH in this situation. Monitoring of insecticide resistance in species A is therefore recommended as the basis for future choice of insecticides to be used by the National Malaria Eradication Programme.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here