Premium
Comparison of fluoroquinolone pharmacokinetic parameters after treatment with marbofloxacin, enrofloxacin, and difloxacin in dogs
Author(s) -
Frazier D. L.,
Thompson L.,
Trettien A.,
Evans E. I.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.527
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1365-2885
pISSN - 0140-7783
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2000.00285.x
Subject(s) - enrofloxacin , pharmacokinetics , ciprofloxacin , urine , chemistry , crossover study , metabolite , plasma concentration , zoology , dosing , washout , active metabolite , pharmacology , chromatography , medicine , antibiotics , biology , biochemistry , alternative medicine , pathology , placebo
Plasma, urine, and skin drug concentrations were determined for dogs ( n =12) given five daily oral doses of marbofloxacin (MAR) (2.75 mg/kg), enrofloxacin (ENR) (5.0 mg/kg) or difloxacin (DIF) (5.0 mg/kg). Concentrations of the active metabolite of ENR, ciprofloxacin (CIP), were also determined. The three‐period, three‐treatment crossover experimental design included a 21‐day washout period between treatments. Area under the plasma drug concentration vs. time curve ( AUC 0‐last, μg/mL×h of MAR was greater than for ENR, CIP, ENR/CIP combined, and DIF. Maximum concentration ( C max) of MAR was greater than ENR, CIP, and DIF. Time of maximum plasma concentration ( T max) was similar for MAR and DIF; T max occurred earlier for ENR and later for CIP. Plasma half‐life ( t 1/2) of MAR was longer than for ENR, CIP, and DIF. Urine concentrations of DIF were less than MAR or ENR/CIP combined, but urine concentrations of MAR and ENR/CIP combined did not differ. DIF skin concentrations were less than the concentrations of MAR or ENR/CIP combined 2 h after dosing, but skin concentrations of MAR and ENR/CIP combined did not differ.