Premium
Norfloxacin nicotinate pharmacokinetics in unwearied and weaned calves
Author(s) -
GIPS M.,
SOBACK S.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.527
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1365-2885
pISSN - 0140-7783
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1996.tb00025.x
Subject(s) - pharmacokinetics , norfloxacin , volume of distribution , bioavailability , zoology , absorption (acoustics) , distribution (mathematics) , medicine , chemistry , pharmacology , antibiotics , biology , mathematics , mathematical analysis , biochemistry , ciprofloxacin , physics , acoustics
The pharmacokinetics of norfloxacin nicotinate were investigated in unweaned and weaned calves. Following intravenous administration of 7.5 and 15 mg/kg (calculated as norfloxacin base) the clearance values were 8.5/pm 2.0 or 7.7/pm 1.2mL/min·kg (unweaned calves) and 11.7/pm 3.2 or 16.1/pm 3.3mL/min·kg (weaned calves). Norfloxacin mean residence time and volume of distribution values were 211/pm 33 or 227/pm 41 min (unweaned calves) and 185/pm 79 or 128/pm18 minutes (weaned calves), and 1.8/pm0.3 or 1.7/pm0.1L/kg (unweaned calves) and 2.0/pm0.7 or 2.1/pm0.7L/kg (weaned calves) following administration of the lower and higher dose, respectively. These results indicated that norfloxacin pharmacokinetics were similar at a dose range of 7.5‐15 mg/kg. However, a significant difference was observed in clearance, mean residence time and the half‐life values between the unweaned and weaned calves. The only major pharmacokinetic parameter which did not show a significant difference between the investigated groups was the volume of distribution. The pharmacokinetic differences between the non‐ruminating (unweaned) and ruminating (weaned) animals seemed to result from changes in drug clearance. The absorption rate after intramuscular administration appeared to change as a result of dose increase. Norfloxacin bioavailability following intramuscular administration ranged from 73 to 106%. The results suggested that larger injection volumes may reduce the extent of absorption.