Premium
The dose‐related effects of phenylbutazone and a methylprednisolone acetate formulation (Depo‐Medrol®) on cultured explants of equine carpal articular cartilage
Author(s) -
JOLLY W.T.,
WHITTEM T.,
JOLLY A.C.,
FIRTH E.C
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.527
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1365-2885
pISSN - 0140-7783
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1995.tb00621.x
Subject(s) - phenylbutazone , proteoglycan , cartilage , chondrocyte , chemistry , andrology , explant culture , viability assay , methylprednisolone , pharmacology , medicine , biochemistry , anatomy , cell , in vitro
The dose‐related effects of phenylbutazone and Depo‐Medrol® on chondrocyte viability and chondrocyte‐mediated synthesis and depletion of proteoglycans were investigated using cultured explants of equine middle carpal joint articular cartilage. Explants from 12 horses (941 × 3 mm diameter) were cultured for a total of 5 days, which included 3 days' exposure to either phenylbutazone (0, 2, 20, 200 or 2000 μg/mL) or Depo‐Medrol (0, 20, 200 or 2000 μg/mL). For each explant, amino sugar content was used as a measure of proteoglycan content, 35 S incorporation as a measure of the rate of proteoglycan synthesis and the number of pyknotic nuclei as a measure of cell death. During culture, control explants remained metabolically active and viable but suffered a net loss of proteoglycans. Proteoglycan loss was reduced by the presence of either phenylbutazone or Depo‐Medrol. This effect was significant at clinically relevant concentrations of phenylbutazone (2–20 μg/mL), but not Depo‐Medrol (20–200 μg/mL). Depo‐Medrol caused a dose‐dependent suppression of proteoglycan synthesis at all concentrations, but chondrocyte viability was affected only at the 2000 μg/mL dose. Phenylbutazone affected proteoglycan synthesis and cell viability only at the 2000 μg/mL concentration. At all concentrations, the anticatabolic effects of each drug influenced the proteoglycan content of the explants far more than did any antianabolic or cytotoxic drug effect. The results suggest that the therapeutic potential of both phenylbutazone and Depo‐Medrol may not be restricted to their anti‐inflammatory effects on the soft tissues of the joint.