Premium
Who is pre‐occupied with sleep? A comparison of attention bias in people with psychophysiological insomnia, delayed sleep phase syndrome and good sleepers using the induced change blindness paradigm
Author(s) -
MARCHETTI LAUREN M.,
BIELLO STEPHANY M.,
BROOMFIELD NIALL M.,
MACMAHON KENNETH M. A.,
ESPIE COLIN A.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of sleep research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2869
pISSN - 0962-1105
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2006.00510.x
Subject(s) - actigraphy , insomnia , psychology , attentional bias , delayed sleep phase , arousal , audiology , sleep (system call) , cognition , sleep onset , cognitive psychology , sleep disorder , psychiatry , medicine , neuroscience , computer science , operating system
Summary Cognitive models of insomnia suggest that selective attention may be involved in maintaining the disorder. However, direct assessment of selective attention is limited. Using the inducing change blindness (ICB) paradigm we aimed to determine whether there is attentional preference for sleep‐related stimuli in psychophysiological insomnia (PI) relative to delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS) and good sleepers (GS). In the ICB task, a visual scene, comprising both sleep‐related and neutral stimuli, ‘flickers’ back and forth with one element (sleep or neutral) of the scene changing between presentations. Therefore, a 2 × 3 totally between‐participants design was employed. The dependent variable was the number of flickers it took for the participant to identify the change. Ninety individuals (30 per group) were classified using ICSD‐R criteria, self‐report diaries and wrist actigraphy. As predicted, PI detected a sleep‐related change significantly quicker than DSPS and GS, and significantly quicker than a sleep‐neutral change. Unexpectedly, DSPS detected a sleep‐related change significantly quicker than GS. No other differences were observed between the two controls. These results support the notion that there is an attention bias to sleep stimuli in PI, suggesting that selective attention tasks such as the ICB may be a useful objective index of cognitive arousal in insomnia. The results also suggest that there may be an element of sleep preoccupation associated with DSPS. Results are discussed with reference to other experiments on attentional processing in insomnia.