Premium
Electromyographic standardized indices in healthy Brazilian young adults and data reproducibility
Author(s) -
DE FELÍCIO C. M.,
SIDEQUERSKY F. V.,
TARTAGLIA G. M.,
SFORZA C.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01970.x
Subject(s) - reproducibility , electromyography , masticatory force , medicine , stomatognathic system , dentistry , orthodontics , physical medicine and rehabilitation , mathematics , statistics
Summary The determination of normal parameters is an important procedure in the evaluation of the stomatognathic system. We used the surface electromyography standardization protocol described by Ferrario et al. (J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:33–40, 2006;33:341) to determine reference values of the electromyographic standardized indices for the assessment of muscular symmetry (left and right side, percentage overlapping coefficient, POC), potential lateral displacing components (unbalanced contractile activities of contralateral masseter and temporalis muscles, TC), relative activity (most prevalent pair of masticatory muscles, ATTIV) and total activity (integrated areas of the electromyographic potentials over time, IMPACT) in healthy Brazilian young adults, and the relevant data reproducibility. Electromyography of the right and left masseter and temporalis muscles was performed during maximum teeth clenching in 20 healthy subjects (10 women and 10 men, mean age 23 years, s.d. 3), free from periodontal problems, temporomandibular disorders, oro‐facial myofunctional disorder, and with full permanent dentition (28 teeth at least). Data reproducibility was computed for 75% of the sample. The values obtained were POC Temporal (88·11 ± 1·45%), POC masseter (87·11 ± 1·60%), TC (8·79 ± 1·20%), ATTIV (−0·33 ± 9·65%) and IMPACT (110·40 ± 23·69 μV/μV·s %). There were no statistical differences between test and retest values ( P > 0·05). The Technical Errors of Measurement (TEM) for 50% of subjects assessed during the same session were 1·5, 1·39, 1·06, 3·83 and 10·04. For 25% of the subjects assessed after a 6‐month interval, the TEM were 0·80, 1·03, 0·73, 12·70 and 19·10. For all indices, there was good reproducibility. These electromyographic indices could be used in the assessment of patients with stomatognathic dysfunction.