Premium
Coronal tooth structure in root‐treated teeth prepared for complete and partial coverage restorations
Author(s) -
MURPHY F.,
MCDONALD A.,
PETRIE A.,
PALMER G.,
SETCHELL D.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01952.x
Subject(s) - coronal plane , crown (dentistry) , dentistry , molar , amalgam (chemistry) , orthodontics , medicine , removable partial denture , materials science , dentures , chemistry , electrode , radiology
Summary This in vivo study assessed the remaining coronal tooth structure in teeth prepared for complete and partial coverage restorations using 3D‐scanning and a Tooth Restorability Index (TRI). The cuspal coverage preparation designs selected by 10 postgraduate dentists and 10 general dental practitioners were recorded in a questionnaire. Eighteen patients had molar root treatment completed at the Eastman Dental Hospital and were prescribed a coronal‐radicular amalgam core and cast restoration. Each tooth was prepared in vivo by one operator for a cast restoration. Two clinical impressions were made to produce two dies: one of remaining coronal tooth structure before crown preparation and a second die of coronal tooth structure in vivo after crown preparation. For teeth prepared for partial coverage in vivo ( n = 13), a third die was prepared in vitro representing remaining tooth structure after complete coverage preparation. The three dies were of tooth structure prior to core placement. All dies ( n = 31) were scanned using a laser profilometer and the volume of remaining tooth structure calculated. Four observers scored 31 dies using the TRI. The percentage loss of coronal tooth volume following a complete instead of a partial coverage preparation varied from 3·29% to 45·23% and the mean TRI fell from 10·7 to 7·5 units. There was a strong correlation between mean TRI and scanned volume of tooth structure ( P = 0·013). Over 50% of the dentists altered their initial choice of restoration design from complete to partial coverage. Complete coverage preparations removed more tooth structure than partial coverage.