Premium
Morphometric relationships between tooth and face shapes
Author(s) -
Lindemann H.B.,
Knauer C.,
Pfeiffer P.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01331.x
Subject(s) - chin , maxillary central incisor , orthodontics , mathematics , face (sociological concept) , eyebrow , dentistry , medicine , anatomy , social science , sociology , surgery
summary The shape of a patient's face is commonly used as a reference to select the shape of the maxillary central incisors in edentulous patients. The validity of this relationship has not been proved. The objective of this clinical study was to determine whether a relationship exists between maxillary central incisors and face shapes. Casts were made of the maxillas of 50 men and 50 women. A standardized digital photographic procedure was used to record frontal views of each subject's face and of the maxillary central incisors of the dental casts. The shapes of the maxillary central incisors were compared with the face forms. Shape matches were evaluated according to their Hausdorff distance (HDD). The function h (A,B) is called the directed HDD from shape A to shape B (this function is not a true distance). It reflects the distance of the point of shape A that is farthest from any point of shape B and vice versa. The similarity of both shapes is given as a non‐negative number. The value 0·0 indicates that the figures are identical (after scaling and shifting). Higher values indicate that shapes differ more substantially. Significant differences on the 5% level were calculated using the non‐parametric Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests. The face shape from the chin margin to the eyebrow line (superior edges of the eyebrows) produced a better match than the one from the chin to the hairline ( P < 0·0001). On average, the maxillary central incisors displayed a variability (0·084 ± 0·028) that was higher by a factor of 1·9 than the face shapes (chin margin to the eyebrow line, 0·045 ± 0·015). In the interindividual comparison, the shapes of the maxillary central incisors of women displayed a significantly smaller HDD than the ones of the men ( P < 0·0001).