Premium
Glass–fibre‐reinforced‐composite fixed partial dentures on dental implants
Author(s) -
Behr M.,
Rosentritt M.,
Lang R.,
Chazot C.,
Handel G.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00768.x
Subject(s) - materials science , glass fiber , cementation (geology) , composite material , composite number , crown (dentistry) , dentistry , titanium , cement , medicine , metallurgy
The objective was to investigate the fracture strength and marginal fit of implant suprastructures made of fibre‐reinforced composite which were fixed onto the implants using cementation or screws. A sample ( n =8) of 4‐unit bridges, made of the fibre‐reinforced composite Vectris/Targis, were adhesively cemented onto titanium conical implant abutments. The second sample consisted of eight screwable Vectris/Targis bridges which were based on prototypes of titanium crown bases. After a 5 year simulation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading (TCML), all specimen were loaded to fracture. Marginal fit was investigated using a semiquantitative SEM analysis. The cemented 4‐unit bridges showed a fracture strength of 1553 N ( Q 1 =1498 N, Q 3 =1825 N) and the screw‐fixed bridges had a median of 1457 N ( Q 1 =1223 N, Q 3 = 1781 N). The analysis of the marginal adaptation showed similar results of cemented and screwed bridges. The bond between the Targis facing‐material and the composite cement was significantly deteriorated after TCML. Conclusion : Suprastructures made of glass–fibre‐reinforced composite could become an alternative to reconstructions with a metal‐framework. Both, fixation onto the implants with screws or cementation, are possible.