Premium
Multidimensional evaluation of craniomandibular dysfunction. II: Pain assessment
Author(s) -
LEEUW J.R.J.,
ROS W.J.G.,
STEENKS M.H.,
LOBBEZOOSCHOLTE A.M.,
BOSMAN F.,
WINNUBST J.A.M.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01166.x
Subject(s) - medicine , orofacial pain , psychology , dentistry , physical therapy
Summary To standardize clinical history taking, a comprehensive anamnestic questionnaire was developed (Screen). Screen includes questions about: (i) pain, (ii) other symptoms of craniomandibular dysfuntion (CMD), (iii) correlates of CMD, (iv) pychosocial factors, and (v) general health. The current study focuses on variables in Screen concerning pain reported somewhere in the head, neck and/or shoulders. This study was performed to assess whether subgroups of patients with signs and symptoms of CMD and a control group of dental patients with and without signs and symptoms of CMD can be characterized by differences in areas reported to be painful, in quantitative and qualitative characteristics of pain, and in factors exacerbating pain. Results indicate that several characteristics of pain as measured in Screen can be used to discriminate between: (i) subgroups of subjects with signs and/or symptoms of CMD and controls without signs or symptoms of CMD, (ii) subgroups of clinical cases and controls with signs or symptoms of CMD, and (iii) patients with CMD with mainly a myogenous component and patients with CMD with mainly an arthrogenous component. The results of logistic regression analysis indicate that four adverbs describing pain correctly classified 75% of patients with CMD‐myo and patients with CMD‐arthro. Differences between patients and controls are interpreted with regard to the correct classification of patients with CMD with a mainly myogenous component and patients with CMD with a mainly arthrogenous component and the subjective treatment need for CMD. Implications for further research are discussed.