Premium
Simultaneous confocal recording of multiple fluorescent labels with improved channel separation
Author(s) -
CARLSSON K.,
ÅSLUND N.,
MOSSBERG K.,
PHILIP J.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of microscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.569
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2818
pISSN - 0022-2720
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1994.tb03527.x
Subject(s) - photomultiplier , confocal , optics , wavelength , dichroic glass , dichroic filter , fluorescence , materials science , laser , fluorophore , detector , amplifier , microscope , optoelectronics , physics , cmos
Confocal microscopes are often used to study specimens labelled with fluorophores. A commonly used method for simultaneous recording of the distribution of multiple fluorophores is to divide the fluorescent light emitted by the specimen into different wavelength regions using dichroic and bandpass filters. These different wavelength regions are then distributed to multiple detectors. However, the broad and overlapping spectra of commonly used fluorophores often result in considerable crosstalk between channels. A new technique, intensity‐modulated multiple‐beam scanning (IMS) microfluorometry, can be used to reduce this cross‐talk substantially. The IMS technique is implemented with two laser beams of different wavelengths, intensity‐modulated at different frequencies, which illuminate the specimen simultaneously. The two laser wavelengths predominantly excite one fluorophore each. Fluorescent light from the specimen is divided into two wavelength regions (red and green) which are detected by two photomultiplier tubes. The output signals from the photomultiplier tubes are connected to lock‐in amplifiers. The effect of using modulated laser beams, in combination with lock‐in amplifiers, is strongly to reduce cross‐talk between the channels. The performance of the IMS technique using various types of specimen is compared with the results obtained using the conventional multi‐detector method.