Premium
Estimating the surface density of fissures in clay soil from deterministic parallel sections
Author(s) -
Scott G. J. T.,
Webster R.,
Nortcliff S.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of microscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.569
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2818
pISSN - 0022-2720
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb02974.x
Subject(s) - subsoil , displacement (psychology) , planar , point (geometry) , geometry , intersection (aeronautics) , plane (geometry) , isotropy , geology , mineralogy , interface (matter) , series (stratigraphy) , cuboid , materials science , soil water , optics , mathematics , soil science , composite material , physics , geography , computer science , psychology , paleontology , computer graphics (images) , cartography , capillary number , capillary action , psychotherapist
SUMMARY In much clay soil the pore space consists of 3‐D networks of narrow, approximately planar fissures. The density of the interface between fissures and solid soil is important; a method for its estimation from the horizontal and vertical cuboid samples that are taken conventionally is described here. Undisturbed samples are impregnated with resin containing a fluorescent dye. Parallel plane faces are cut, and the exposed surfaces are photographed under u.v. light. Pairs of superimposed photographic negatives are projected onto a screen, and the lateral displacement of each interface from one section to the next is measured at points of intersection of the interface with linear probes through the soil. These distances are used to infer the local orientation of the interfaces, which are then used with the point counts to estimate the interface areas. The method was applied to subsoil of the Windsor series. The interface density was estimated to be 9.69cm 2 /cm 3 from one horizontal and one vertical sample. Point‐counting with isotropic uniform random linear probes applied to five randomly orientated samples from the same site gave an estimate of 8.78cm 2 /cm 3 . It seems probable that the error associated with the new method is no greater than that associated with the standard method.