Premium
Quantitative studies on the preservation of choline and ethanolamine phosphatides during tissue preparation for electron microscopy
Author(s) -
Cope G. H.,
Williams M. A.
Publication year - 1969
Publication title -
journal of microscopy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.569
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1365-2818
pISSN - 0022-2720
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1969.tb00693.x
Subject(s) - chemistry , ethanolamine , potassium permanganate , chromatography , membrane , phospholipid , glutaraldehyde , acetone , permanganate , ethylene glycol , electron microscope , dehydration , solvent , biochemistry , organic chemistry , physics , optics
SUMMARY The loss of 14 C‐ethanolamine‐ and 3 H‐choline‐labelled phospholipids from rat liver during preparation for electron microscopy by some less frequently used processing methods has been examined. Permanganate and formaldehyde‐potassium dichromate fixation followed by Araldite embedding were investigated and five procedures involving embedding in water‐miscible methacrylates (GMA). These procedures included a conventional method of dehydration and embedding in GMA, a low‐temperature GMA embedding method, dehydration with ethylene glycol, freeze drying and freeze substitution. These results are compared with those obtained after conventional tissue preparation (presented previously, Cope & Williams, 1969). Formaldehyde‐potassium dichromate compared favourably with the conventional procedures for the preservation of both phosphatides, especially phosphatidyl ethanolamine. Permanganate fixation was much less effective. Severe loss of both phosphatides occured after freeze drying and freeze substitution in glutaraldehyde‐alcohol. GMA is shown to be a more potent phospholipid solvent than ethanol under the conditions employed. Low‐temperature embedding reduced the loss of phosphatidyl choline during embedding. Results obtained by scintillation counting were confirmed by grain counts on thick‐section autoradiographs. No direct relationship between extraction and the electron‐microscopic appearance of membranes was discernible. It is believed that membrane prominence is largely dependent upon the electron density of the surrounding cytoplasm rather than on the degree of phospholipid extraction.