z-logo
Premium
Procedural discourse in intellectual disability and dual diagnosis
Author(s) -
Ryan J.,
Woodyatt G.,
Copeland D.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of intellectual disability research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1365-2788
pISSN - 0964-2633
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01229.x
Subject(s) - intellectual disability , cohort , psychology , schizophrenia (object oriented programming) , dual diagnosis , task (project management) , dual (grammatical number) , psychosis , mental illness , learning disability , borderline intellectual functioning , psychiatry , developmental psychology , mental health , clinical psychology , cognition , medicine , linguistics , management , philosophy , economics
Background  Knowledge of discourse abilities of adults with intellectual disability (ID) and mental illness is limited. The present study examined the procedural discourse skills of two cohorts of adults with ID – one cohort with ( n  = 7) and one cohort without ( n  = 7) a psychiatric diagnosis of psychosis. Methods  Participants completed the ‘dice game’, a procedural discourse elicitation procedure that has been used by previous researchers. Results  Results revealed that while all participants demonstrated an understanding of the task, participants with ID alone were more able to communicate the key elements of the game than the participants in the dual diagnosis group. Conclusions  Results of this investigation suggest that individuals with dual diagnosis have difficulties that may relate to previously identified discourse impairments in people with schizophrenia, and this may relate to a larger difficulty in taking into account the listener's needs.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here