Premium
Choosing a measure of support need: implications for research and policy
Author(s) -
Brown H. K.,
OuelletteKuntz H.,
Bielska I.,
Elliott D.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of intellectual disability research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1365-2788
pISSN - 0964-2633
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01216.x
Subject(s) - psychology , proxy (statistics) , positive behavior support , developmental psychology , construct (python library) , intellectual disability , scale (ratio) , adaptive behavior , sample (material) , construct validity , clinical psychology , cognitive psychology , psychometrics , statistics , psychiatry , computer science , physics , chemistry , mathematics , chromatography , quantum mechanics , programming language , intervention (counseling)
Background The paradigm surrounding the delivery of care for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID) is shifting from a deficit‐based approach to a support‐based approach. However, it is unclear whether measures of support act as a proxy for adaptive functioning. Methods A sample of 40 staff or family members of individuals with ID completed the Supports Intensity Scale and the Scales of Independent Behavior‐Revised, Short Form. Correlations were used to examine the relationship between these scales. Results The subscales of the Supports Intensity Scale as well as the overall support needs index were highly correlated with both the Broad Independence W score and the support score (which reflects both maladaptive and adaptive behaviours) of the Scales of Independent Behavior‐Revised. Conclusions The strong correlations between these two scales confirm previous findings that current measures of support and measures of adaptive behaviour tap into the same underlying construct. These findings have implications for the development, use and interpretation of research and planning tools.