Premium
The nature and extent of aggressive behaviour amongst people with learning difficulties (mental handicap) in a single health district
Author(s) -
HARRIS P.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of intellectual disability research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1365-2788
pISSN - 0964-2633
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1993.tb01281.x
Subject(s) - mental health , psychology , psychiatry , developmental psychology
. This paper describes the method and results of a survey of aggressive behaviour amongst people with learning difficulties. The study was confined to a single health district in the South Western Region of the UK with a general population of about 370000. At the time of the survey, the Handicap Register for the district recorded 1362 people as having a learning difFiculty. The overall prevalence of aggressive behaviour amongst people with learning difficulties for whom base population data was available was 17.6%. The lowest rate was identified amongst day facilities (9.7 %) and the highest in hospitals within the district (38.2%). The prevalence rate amongst those attending schools for children with severe learning difSculties was 12.6%. Proportionately more males than females were reported to present problems of aggressive behaviour. The gender difference appeared to be largely accounted for by the disproportionate number of men identified within day facilities. There was no significant evidence of an association between the person's gender and the presence aggressive behaviour within schools or hospitals. The results indicated that, although physical and verbal aggression were the most frequently reponed behaviours, many of the sample were also said to engage in other forms of challenging behaviour, particularly self‐injurious, ritualistic, stereotypical and withdrawn behaviour. The risk of a serious or very serious injury to another person was very low; 0.7% or six people with learning difiSculties firom the district were reponed to be currently presenting such a risk. Similarly, only 2% of the base population (n=18) were reponed to be extremely difficult to manage. The implications of the findings are discussed.