Premium
Screening and selection of human volunteers at increased cardio‐metabolic risk for a dietary intervention study, with particular reference to levels of liver fat
Author(s) -
ThorntonWood C.,
Isherwood C.,
Umpleby M.,
Griffin B.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of human nutrition and dietetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.951
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1365-277X
pISSN - 0952-3871
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2011.01175_38.x
Subject(s) - medicine , overweight , anthropometry , metabolic syndrome , sample size determination , diabetes mellitus , obesity , physiology , endocrinology , statistics , mathematics
Background: Individuals at increased cardio‐metabolic (CM) risk have a greater chance of developing diabetes mellitus and suffering premature cardiovascular events. The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a constellation of risk factors which confer increased CM risk. MetS was originally proposed by Reaven (1998) and the currently accepted definition was agreed by AHA/NHLBI,WH,IASIASO (Alberti et al. , 2009). More recently, increased liver fat has been proposed as a marker of CM risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate the inter‐relationships between percentage liver fat and established CM risk factors and identify those with MetS. Methods: This paper presents a secondary analysis of baseline data from a sample ( n = 37) (56 ± 5.32 years), of overweight men who were at increased CM risk but otherwise healthy,, and recruited into a randomised dietary intervention crossover study to investigate how dietary carbohydrate influences the metabolism of plasma lipoproteins in overweight volunteers with moderately high (>10% <20%) and low (<2%) levels of liver fat. Anthropometric and biochemistry measurements were obtained, and from a sub‐sample, the percentage of liver fat by magnetic resonance imaging. The participants were also assigned a metabolic score based on the number of indicators of the MetS according to the AHA/NHLBI, WH, IASIASO definition (Alberti, 2009). Non‐parametric statistical analyses was used, as not all variables were normally distributed, there were a number of outliers and a small sample size. Pearson Correlation Co‐efficients were used to investigate relationships between continuous and categorical variables. The variables were not adjusted for age or BMI because of a small sample size. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05 and all analyses were carried out using SPSS 16.0. Results: Fifty nine per cent of the participants had MetS ( n = 21). There was evidence of significant, positive associations between the metabolic score for MetS and total cholesterol:HDL‐C ratio ( P = 0.030), and between percentage liver fat and plasma glucose and insulin ( P = 0.010 and P = 0.003 respectively). The percentage of liver fat was also notably higher than that reported in other studies (Yamada et al. , 2010; Kotronen et al. , 2007) and there was positive correlation between the liver enzyme alanine transaminase (ALT) and plasma insulin ( P = 0.012). Conclusion: The strong associations between established risk factors and liver fat suggest that the latter may be clinically useful as a marker for CM risk in MetS. References: Alberti, K., Eckel, R., Grundy, S. et al. (2009) Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 120 , 1640–1645. Kotronen, A., Westerbacka, A., Bergholm, R., Pietilainen, K.H. & Yki‐Jarvinen, H. (2007) Liver fat in the metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92 , 3490–3497. Reaven, G. (1998) Insulin resistance and human disease: a short history. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 9 , 387–406. Yamada, T., Fukatsu, M., Suzuki, S. et al. (2010) Fatty liver predicts impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japanese undergoing a health checkup. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 25 , 352–356.