Premium
Proliferative kidney disease in rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri Richardson
Author(s) -
FERGUSON H. W.,
NEEDHAM E. A.
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
journal of fish diseases
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.819
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1365-2761
pISSN - 0140-7775
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2761.1978.tb00008.x
Subject(s) - biology , salmo , nucleolus , rainbow trout , cytoplasm , eosinophilic , amoeba (genus) , outbreak , parasite hosting , pathology , trout , zoology , anatomy , microbiology and biotechnology , fish <actinopterygii> , genetics , virology , fishery , medicine , world wide web , computer science
. Two entirely separate outbreaks of PKD are described in an attempt to properly define the condition and enable it to be differentiated from other diseases of a similar nature. Losses of up to 75% of fingerling rainbow trout were recorded in one outbreak, illustrating the potentially serious nature of the disease. Although the kidneys showed the most obvious pathological changes, other organs were also affected. The host response was granulomatous in type, the foci of each cellular reaction being 5‐20 μm eosinophilic cells considered to be parasitic. The cytoplasm of these cells contained numerous electron dense bodies some with a tail, but each with an electron lucent bar always orientated at right angles to the plasmalemma whenever they were near it. The most obvious cytoplasmic inclusion of these ‘parasites’ were other cells numbering up to five or six, each with its own nucleus and nucleolus, but devoid of any of the small electron dense bodies. The significance of either of these inclusions is unknown. A limited differential diagnosis is given, and the argument presented that the condition PKD is the result of infection by a parasite, possibly an amoeba, in combination with poor quality water.