Premium
A nationwide evaluation on electronic medication‐related information provided by hospital websites
Author(s) -
Lin HsiangWen,
Ku ChungHui,
Li Juifen,
Tan An Chee,
Chou ChiaHung
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01823.x
Subject(s) - medical prescription , audit , the internet , medicine , medical emergency , quality (philosophy) , citation , family medicine , descriptive statistics , scale (ratio) , hospital information system , information system , business , nursing , computer science , world wide web , accounting , philosophy , statistics , physics , mathematics , epistemology , quantum mechanics , electrical engineering , engineering
Rational, aims and objectives The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of electronic medication‐related information (e‐MRI) via Internet offered by the hospital settings in Taiwan. Methods The structured Internet search and comprehensive review were performed on the most commonly used search engines in Taiwan. The assessment checklists were developed to describe the characteristics of general, e‐MRI in the years 2008 and 2010, and specific digoxin information in 2011 based on the operational definitions derived from other studies. The descriptive analyses and chi‐square tests for the retrieved data were performed. Results With approximately 15% of hospital settings providing general, e‐MRI on their websites, their content varied but was not statistically significant, and different among the providers from different levels of hospitals and in different years. More medical centres provided the information with the updated dates and contact approaches than the smaller scale hospitals. Little was found about reference citation and authorships for those general, e‐MRI websites. More medical centres created the accesses to search for the individual prescription in the corresponding settings and the specific information about digoxin storage. However, more district hospitals provided the precaution and dosage form information about digoxin. Conclusions The providers to offer the e‐MRI via hospital websites in Taiwan could be more responsible for its update, authorship and evidence. Further, the provision of electronic medication‐related information via the Internet should be regularly examined or audited by the neutral personnel or organizations to ensure its quality.