Premium
Relationship between pre‐discharge occupational therapy home assessment and prevalence of post‐discharge falls
Author(s) -
Johnston Kylie,
Barras Sarah,
GrimmerSomers Karen
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01339.x
Subject(s) - medicine , confidence interval , physical therapy , logistic regression , odds ratio , rehabilitation , risk assessment , falling (accident) , cohort study , computer security , environmental health , computer science
Rationale, aims and objective Pre‐discharge occupational therapy home assessments are common practice, and considered important for falls prevention in older people. This prospective, observational cohort study describes the association between pre‐discharge home assessment and falls in the first month post‐discharge from a rehabilitation hospital. Methods 342 inpatients were recruited and followed up 1 month post‐discharge. Patients were classified into diagnostic groups (cardiac, orthopaedic trauma, spinal, peripheral joint surgery, neurological and deconditioned). Age, gender, falls risk [Falls Risk Assessment Scoring System (FRASS)], functional independence scores (FIM™) and receipt (or not) of a home assessment were recorded. Patients completed a diary to document post‐discharge falls. Logistic regression analysis tested the effect on falling of receiving a home assessment, age, gender, diagnostic group, FRASS and FIM™. Results Considering all subjects, not receiving a home assessment increased the risk of falling 1 month post‐discharge [odds ratio (OR) 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–4.7, P = 0.003]. Neurological and orthopaedic trauma patients had significantly elevated risks of falling [OR (95% CI), respectively, 12.5 (4.7–33.2), 3.4 (1.4–8.4)] relative to the orthopaedic joint group. For all diagnostic groups except neurological, falls risk was mitigated by a home assessment. In non‐neurological patients, adjusting for the effect of diagnostic group, FRASS and FIM™ scores indicated a significant association between not receiving a home assessment and falling (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.1–8.2, P < 0.001). Conclusions Pre‐discharge occupational therapy home assessments are sound post‐discharge falls‐prevention strategies in non‐neurological patients. The decision to conduct a home assessment should consider diagnosis, falls risk and functional independence.