Premium
Construct and criterion validity of the SF‐12 health questionnaire in patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina
Author(s) -
Failde Inmaculada,
Medina Pilar,
Ramirez Carmen,
Arana Roque
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01161.x
Subject(s) - medicine , unstable angina , construct validity , myocardial infarction , sf 36 , equivalence (formal languages) , angina , coronary heart disease , quality of life (healthcare) , physical therapy , criterion validity , mental health , disease , health related quality of life , psychometrics , clinical psychology , psychiatry , nursing , linguistics , philosophy
Background The aim of the study was to determine the construct and criterion validity of the 12‐item short‐form questionnaire (SF‐12) in coronary patients with either acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina in Spain. Method A total of 186 patients hospitalized with coronary heart disease have been studied. The construct validity has been analysed by means of the association between the SF‐12v.1 and sociodemographic and clinical variables; and the criterion validity was tested by the correlations between 36‐item short‐form question (SF‐36) and SF‐12 summary scores. The equivalence between both health questionnaires was examined by means of the proportion of variance in the SF‐36 physical and mental component summary (PCS‐36 and MCS‐36) scores explained by the 12 items adjusted by age and sex. Results The validation result was as expected: female patients and those with poor education level, worse mental health, unstable angina, cardiovascular risk factor and co‐morbidity obtained a lower score in the SF‐12. The correlations between SF‐36 and SF‐12 summary scores were high. The equivalence between the SF‐12 and SF‐36 was good, because the models explained 87% of the variation in PCS‐36 score and 93% of the variation in MCS‐36. Conclusion The SF‐12 is a valid tool in studies assessing health‐related quality of life in coronary patients. The use of the SF‐12 may be especially useful in patients where the clinical situation make difficult the application of the longer instrument.