z-logo
Premium
The validity of the CGI severity and improvement scales as measures of clinical effectiveness suitable for routine clinical use
Author(s) -
Berk Michael,
Ng Felicity,
Dodd Seetal,
Callaly Tom,
Campbell Shirley,
Bernardo Michelle,
Trauer Tom
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of evaluation in clinical practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2753
pISSN - 1356-1294
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00921.x
Subject(s) - medicine , demographics , clinical global impression , reliability (semiconductor) , metric (unit) , scale (ratio) , test (biology) , physical therapy , paleontology , power (physics) , operations management , physics , alternative medicine , demography , pathology , quantum mechanics , sociology , economics , biology , placebo
Objective  The Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) is established as a core metric in psychiatric research. This study aims to test the validity of CGI as a clinical outcome measure suitable for routine use in a private inpatient setting. Methods  The CGI was added to a standard battery of routine outcome measures in a private psychiatric hospital. Data were collected on consecutive admissions over a period of 24 months, which included clinical diagnosis, demographics, service utilization and four routine measures (CGI, HoNOS, MHQ‐14 and DASS‐21) at both admission and discharge. Descriptive and comparative data analyses were performed. Results  Of 786 admissions in total, there were 624 and 614 CGI‐S ratings completed at the point of admission and discharge, respectively, and 610 completed CGI‐I ratings. The admission and discharge CGI‐S scores were correlated ( r  = 0.40), and the indirect improvement measures obtained from their differences were highly correlated with the direct CGI‐I scores ( r  = 0.71). The CGI results reflected similar trends seen in the other three outcome measures. Conclusions  The CGI is a valid clinical outcome measure suitable for routine use in an inpatient setting. It offers a number of advantages, including its established utility in psychiatric research, sensitivity to change, quick and simple administration, utility across diagnostic groupings, and reliability in the hands of skilled clinicians.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here