Premium
Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: an action research approach
Author(s) -
Swinglehurst D.,
Russell J.,
Greenhalgh T.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of computer assisted learning
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.583
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2729
pISSN - 0266-4909
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00274.x
Subject(s) - thematic analysis , quality (philosophy) , focus group , action research , computer science , portfolio , action (physics) , online teaching , set (abstract data type) , psychology , reflection (computer programming) , best practice , pedagogy , mathematics education , medical education , qualitative research , sociology , social science , philosophy , medicine , physics , management , epistemology , quantum mechanics , anthropology , financial economics , economics , programming language
This paper describes a collaborative action research approach used to explore peer observation of teaching (POT) within the online environment. Although POT has become familiar in face‐to‐face teaching contexts, little is understood of its potential role in online settings. We conducted ‘virtual’ focus groups to explore the experience and views of 28 teachers and subjected our data to a thematic analysis. This informed the implementation of an innovative programme of POT, ‘Peer‐to‐peer Reflection on Pedagogical Practice’ (PROPP) among tutors of a Web‐based MSc in International Primary Health Care at University College London. Modeled on an action learning set, the programme encourages collaborative reflection on teaching practices, based on participants' specific examples of online teaching. The PROPP model is consistent with Quality Enhancement , which we distinguish from Quality Assurance . Here, we describe the implementation of the PROPP programme within an action research framework and identify the factors that we consider critical to the success of peer observation within online courses. We highlight examples of aspects of teaching that have been discussed within the PROPP programme and offer suggestions of the kinds of evidence that could be incorporated into a portfolio to demonstrate the effectiveness of such an initiative.