z-logo
Premium
Glioblastoma: synergy of growth promotion between CCL5 and NK‐1R can be thwarted by blocking CCL5 with miraviroc, an FDA approved anti‐HIV drug and blocking NK‐1R with aprepitant, an FDA approved anti‐nausea drug
Author(s) -
Kast R. E.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.622
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1365-2710
pISSN - 0269-4727
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01148.x
Subject(s) - aprepitant , temozolomide , pharmacology , maraviroc , cancer research , medicine , glioma , immunology , chemotherapy , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , antiemetic
Summary What is known and background:  Two receptor signaling pathways that are commonly active in facilitating glioblastoma growth and invasion‐ that of CCR5 and neurokinin (NK)‐1R‐ have small molecule inhibitors that are FDA approved and marketed to treat other conditions. The anti‐HIV drug, maraviroc, inhibits human CCR5’s ligand from binding, and hence blocks CCR5 stimulation. The anti‐nausea drug aprepitant blocks substance P signaling at NK‐1R. Aims and objective:  We propose on the basis of molecular insights that a combination of the two drugs is likely to be useful in the treatment of glioblastoma. Comment:  After stimulation by their respective ligands both CCR5 and NK‐1R, through intermediaries, phosphorylate and thereby activate ERK1/2, triggering in turn migratory and mitotic events. Neurokinin‐1R second messenger signaling also happens to serine phosphorylate CCR5. Phosphorylated CCR5 exhibits amplified activity after agonist ligation. Therefore, aprepitant and maraviroc combined treatment is expected to exert synergestic inhibition of growth enhancing signaling in glioblastoma. Inhibiting an amplifier is equivalent to amplifying an inhibitor. Since the two suggested drugs are non‐cytotoxic they are envisioned as adjunctive treatments to current standard temozolomide, radiation, and bevacizumab, all to be used after debulking primary resection. What is new and conclusion:  Our analysis makes the case for a well‐designed trial of the proposed combination in the treatment of glioblastoma.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here