z-logo
Premium
Assessment of oral status: evaluation of three oral assessment guides
Author(s) -
HOLMES SUSAN,
MOUNTAIN ELIZABETH
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of clinical nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.94
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1365-2702
pISSN - 0962-1067
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1993.tb00128.x
Subject(s) - medicine , reliability (semiconductor) , disease , validity , intensive care medicine , nursing care , cancer , risk assessment , pathology , psychometrics , clinical psychology , nursing , computer science , power (physics) , physics , computer security , quantum mechanics
Summary• Oral care is a basic nursing activity central to patient comfort and well‐being, the prevention of infection and the maintenance of nutritional status. • This care is particularly important in cancer when both disease and treatment cause significant destruction of oral membranes/teeth, marked decline in salivary secretion and increased risk of infection. Systemic infection, originating in the mouth, is regarded as a significant cause of death. Appropriate oral care is, therefore, an important part of cancer care. • Thorough assessment is required to: provide baseline data, monitor response to therapy, identify new problems as they arise. • Although several assessment guides have been reported, for the majority no reliability/validity data are available. • This paper describes evaluation of the reliability, validity and clinical usefulness of three such guides. All were found reliable with regard to detection of gross abnormalities although precision with regard to scoring of subcategories was less reproducible. • In terms of validity, the literature supported the assessment categories of all tools, although an expert panel, supported by the nursing observers, identified many inappropriate descriptors and omissions highlighting, in particular, the difficulty of selecting appropriate descriptors when differences were observed in different areas of the mouth. • The lack of reliability and validity limits the clinical usefulness of these tools; it also suggests that reservations must be expressed about research based on their use. Further work is required to develop suitable tool(s) for assessing oral status in cancer patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here