Premium
Understanding properly the `potential natural vegetation' concept
Author(s) -
Loidi Javier,
del Arco Marcelino,
Pérez de Paz Pedro Luis,
Asensi Alfredo,
Díez Garretas Blanca,
Costa Manuel,
Díaz González Tomás,
FernándezGonzález Federico,
Izco Jesús,
Penas Ángel,
RivasMartínez Salvador,
SánchezMata Daniel
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
journal of biogeography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.7
H-Index - 158
eISSN - 1365-2699
pISSN - 0305-0270
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02302.x
Subject(s) - vegetation (pathology) , habitats directive , natural (archaeology) , geography , european union , habitat , section (typography) , environmental resource management , directive , ecology , environmental science , computer science , biology , medicine , archaeology , pathology , economic policy , business , operating system , programming language
This is a response to critical comments concerning the inappropriate use of the potential natural vegetation (PNV) concept made in a recent contribution to the Commentary section of this journal. We consider that the PNV concept has been misinterpreted. PNV has been used extensively in several European countries since the mid‐1950s and was never intended to be used to make a prediction of what vegetation would dominate in an area if human influence were removed. PNV maps express hypothetical assumptions of what corresponds to dominant or natural vegetation in each area. Remnants of the vegetation of the past provided by palaeopalynology and other disciplines provide valuable information for interpreting modern vegetation, but natural changes and anthropogenic influences operating over the last millennia have to be taken into account. Annex I of the Habitats Directive provides a balanced list of habitat types for implementing conservation policies within the European Union.