z-logo
Premium
Phenotypic variations of enterococci in surface waters: analysis of biochemical fingerprinting data from multi‐catchments
Author(s) -
Ahmed W.,
Katouli M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of applied microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.889
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2672
pISSN - 1364-5072
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03763.x
Subject(s) - context (archaeology) , biology , host (biology) , drainage basin , representativeness heuristic , ecology , geography , cartography , psychology , paleontology , social psychology
Aims:  The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of environmentally adapted enterococci strains by analysing biochemical fingerprinting (BF) data of 3952 enterococci isolates collected over 5 years from the six catchments in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Methods and Results:  A BF method was used to type 3952 enterococci isolates from six catchments. The environmental isolates were compared with a large existing BF library comprised of 5803 enterococci isolates from 10 host groups. Environmental isolates belonged to 801 biochemical phenotypes (BPTs), of which, an average of 29.2% was specific to each catchment. When compared with the BF library, an average of 79·5% BPTs from each catchment was identical to those in the library (i.e. host‐origin BPTs). The remaining 20·5% was regarded as non‐host origin BPTs, as they were not in the library and constituted only 5·3% of the total isolates tested for each catchment. Conclusions:  Our data suggest that less than 5% of studied environmental strains was not identical to those in the library and seemed to be of environmental origin. From a microbial source tracking context, such low level of environmentally adapted strains can have a minimal impact on the performance of the library‐based methods if a large number of isolates were tested from both the host groups and environmental waters. Significance and Impact of the Study:  These data shed light on the importance of the size and representativeness of library–based source‐tracking methods and their implications for the identification of faecal pollution in environmental waters.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here