Premium
Biotinylation and characterization of Cryptococcus neoformans cell surface proteins
Author(s) -
Foster A.J.,
Bird R.A.,
Smith S.N.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of applied microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.889
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1365-2672
pISSN - 1364-5072
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03259.x
Subject(s) - biotinylation , streptavidin , flow cytometry , biotin , cell , biology , fluorescein isothiocyanate , confocal microscopy , microbiology and biotechnology , population , avidin , fluorescence microscope , biochemistry , chemistry , fluorescence , physics , demography , quantum mechanics , sociology
Aims: To develop a novel procedure for isolating and characterizing cryptococcal cell‐surface proteins using biotinylation, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)–streptavidin, flow cytometry and associated ligand‐receptor analysis, confocal microscopy and electrophoretic separation. Methods and Results: Cell proteins of both acapsulate and encapsulated Cryptococcus neoformans cells were labelled using sulfo‐NHS‐biotin which, in turn, was complexed with FITC–streptavidin. Resulting cell population fluorescence supported visualization of cell‐surface protein distribution by confocal microscopy, as well as evaluation of protein exposure by flow cytometry and the calculation of the ligand‐binding determinants EC 50 , F max and H n . Biotinylation of cell‐surface proteins also supported their isolation by affinity chromatography and characterization by SDS/PAGE. Ligand‐binding determinants, such as EC 50 values, indicated that acapsulate and stationary phase cells have greatest affinity for biotin. F max values demonstrated greatest protein exposure among stationary phase cells; in turn, encapsulated cells expose more protein than acapsulate counterparts. H n values of below unity potentially confirm the complex multi‐receptor nature of biotin binding to cryptococcal cell surfaces under investigation. Fluorescence visualization showed marked but localized fluorescence indicative of protein exposure around sites of cell division. In turn, biotinylation of cell‐surface proteins and their release under reducing conditions demonstrated at least two noncovalently linked proteinaceous entities, of 43 and 57 kDa, exposed on acapsulate cryptococcal cell walls. Conclusions: A novel method for identifying, in situ , cell‐surface proteins exposed by C. neoformans was established. This novel technique was successfully implemented using both acapsulate and encapsulated C. neoformans cells, both were found to have dynamic and markedly localized protein distribution around sites of cell division and associated cell wall trauma. Significance and Impact of the Study: A novel procedure, employing a versatile combination of flow cytometry, ligand‐receptor analysis, confocal microscopy and biotinylation, supported the characterization and isolation of cryptococcal cell‐surface proteins.