Premium
Can multiscale models of species’ distribution be generalized from region to region? A case study of the koala
Author(s) -
McAlpine C. A.,
Rhodes J. R.,
Bowen M. E.,
Lunney D.,
Callaghan J. G.,
Mitchell D. L.,
Possingham H. P.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of applied ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.503
H-Index - 181
eISSN - 1365-2664
pISSN - 0021-8901
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01431.x
Subject(s) - phascolarctos cinereus , context (archaeology) , habitat , range (aeronautics) , geography , ecology , species distribution , wildlife , wildlife conservation , distribution (mathematics) , tree (set theory) , eucalyptus , biology , population , mathematics , mathematical analysis , materials science , demography , archaeology , sociology , composite material
Summary1 While various studies have evaluated the habitat requirements for wildlife in fragmented forest landscapes at multiple spatial scales, few have considered whether there is regional variation in the most important factors. This is a conundrum for managers of any species with a broad geographical range: to what extent should studies in one region inform decisions in another? 2 We addressed this question using a case study of the koala, Phascolarctos cinereus , in three biogeographically different fragmented forested landscapes in eastern Australia. Mixed‐effect logistic models were applied to predict koala occurrence from explanatory variables captured at four spatial scales: the individual tree, the stand (<1 ha), the patch (1–100 ha) and the landscape (100–1000 ha). 3 We used model averaging to account for model and parameter uncertainty, and tested the cross‐regional discrimination ability of the models. 4 We discovered that multiscale models of koala distribution cannot be readily generalized from region to region, and that specific conservation actions for each region, rather than the entire geographical range, are more appropriate. We found a strong justification for adopting a hierarchical landscape approach to koala conservation across its range. However, cross‐regional differences in habitat relationships occurred within this hierarchy. Exceptions were landscape context, which showed a consistently strong effect and high rank in all regions, and the presence of individual preferred tree species of the genus Eucalyptus , which showed modest consistency in its interaction with large‐diameter trees across the regions. In contrast, the remaining habitat variables, including patch size (a key management factor), showed moderate to strong cross‐regional variation attributed to the interaction of edaphic factors, landscape history and contemporary land‐use patterns. 5 Synthesis and applications . Adopting a uniform conservation programme over a large geographical area is attractive to policy‐makers and conservation planners. However, our study confirms the lack of generality of species distribution models over large areas. Consequently, we argue against adopting a uniform conservation programme for species with a large geographical range.