Premium
The Viggers & Hearn conundrum: a kangaroo home range study with no implications for land management
Author(s) -
MARTIN JENNIFER K.,
COULSON GRAEME,
DI STEFANO JULIAN,
RITCHIE EUAN G.,
GREENFIELD ANDREW,
CATANCHIN HELEN,
EVANS LISA N.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of applied ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.503
H-Index - 181
eISSN - 1365-2664
pISSN - 0021-8901
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01309.x
Subject(s) - home range , herbivore , geography , habitat , land use , ecology , vegetation (pathology) , range (aeronautics) , pasture , environmental resource management , land management , work (physics) , biology , environmental science , medicine , mechanical engineering , materials science , pathology , engineering , composite material
Summary1 Viggers & Hearn (2005) examined the encroachment of native herbivores on to farmland. They presented kangaroo home range estimates and pasture biomass data for three sites in south‐eastern Australia, then made broad management recommendations regarding the preservation of remnant habitat. 2 While Viggers & Hearn identified potentially important patterns, we believe that their data were neither sufficient nor appropriate to reveal the processes that underlie these patterns. 3 Specifically, their study was unreplicated at the land‐use level, used inappropriate density estimates for their study populations, failed to measure resources adequately, used flawed methods of home range analysis, and demonstrated limited understanding of key concepts and of their study species and thus could not draw valid conclusions. 4 Synthesis and applications. In view of these fundamental problems, we recommend that decisions on the management of kangaroos and remnant vegetation not be based on the work reported by Viggers & Hearn.