Habitat complexity does not promote coexistence in a size‐structured intraguild predation system

Summary Size‐dependent interactions and habitat complexity have been identified as important factors affecting the persistence of intraguild predation ( IGP ) systems. Habitat complexity has been suggested to promote intraguild ( IG ) prey and intraguild predator coexistence through weakening trophic interactions particularly the predation link. Here, we experimentally investigate the effects of habitat complexity on coexistence and invasion success of differently sized IG ‐predators in a size‐structured IGP system consisting of the IG ‐predator P oecilia reticulata and a resident H eterandria formosa IG ‐prey population. The experiments included medium‐long and long‐term invasion experiments, predator–prey experiments and competition experiments to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the effect of prey refuges. Habitat complexity did not promote the coexistence of IG ‐predator and IG ‐prey, although the predation link was substantially weakened. However, the presence of habitat structure affected the invasion success of large IG ‐predators negatively and the invasion success of small IG ‐predators positively. The effect of refuges on size‐dependent invasion success could be related to a major decrease in the IG ‐predator's capture rate and a shift in the size distribution of IG ‐predator juveniles. In summary, habitat complexity had two main effects: (i) the predation link was diminished, resulting in a more competition driven system and (ii) the overall competitive abilities of the two species were equalized, but coexistence was not promoted. Our results suggest that in a size‐structured IGP system, individual level mechanisms may gain in importance over species level mechanisms in the presence of habitat complexity.