z-logo
Premium
The importance of environmental heterogeneity for species diversity and assemblage structure in Bornean stream frogs
Author(s) -
Keller Alexander,
Rödel MarkOliver,
Linsenmair K. Eduard,
Grafe T. Ulmar
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of animal ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.134
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1365-2656
pISSN - 0021-8790
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01457.x
Subject(s) - ecology , abiotic component , habitat , riparian zone , rainforest , assemblage (archaeology) , guild , community structure , spatial heterogeneity , plant litter , geography , canopy , vegetation (pathology) , understory , ecosystem , biology , medicine , pathology
Summary1 Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the structure of multi‐species assemblages. Among these, abiotic environmental factors and biotic processes are often favoured. Several recent studies examining anuran communities identified environmental factors to be only of minor importance in the composition of leaf‐litter and canopy assemblages in pristine forests. Instead, spatial effects and spatially structured environments were considered more important. 2 In this study, we investigated whether these findings could also be confirmed for very heterogeneous stream habitats in the primary rainforest of the Ulu Temburong National Park, Brunei Darussalam. We thus investigated anuran assemblage compositions on 50 stream sites with regard to environmental and spatial influences. 3 Cross‐product correlations indicated that both factors (spatial and environmental parameters) determined assemblage composition of anurans. Environment itself may be spatially structured, yet this interrelation did not contribute to the explainable variation of frog community compositions within the study area. 4 Detailed analyses of the environmental parameters with nonmetric multidimensional scaling revealed that community structure was mostly affected by three major environmental characters: stream turbidity, river size and the density of understorey vegetation. Based on these habitat characteristics, we assigned species to three distinct habitat guilds. 5 The results underline the importance of riparian habitat heterogeneity in pristine forests in structuring anuran assemblages. We conclude that different anuran assemblages, that is, leaf litter, canopy and stream communities, follow different assemblage rules and thus are not directly comparable.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here