Premium
Non‐competitive phenotypic differences can have a strong effect on ideal free distributions
Author(s) -
Ruxton Graeme D.,
Humphries Stuart,
Farnsworth Keith D.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of animal ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.134
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1365-2656
pISSN - 0021-8790
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2001.00475.x
Subject(s) - trait , competition (biology) , ideal free distribution , phenotype , distribution (mathematics) , biology , competition model , ideal (ethics) , evolutionary biology , ecology , mathematics , microeconomics , genetics , economics , computer science , profit (economics) , philosophy , epistemology , gene , predation , programming language , mathematical analysis
1 We present a model of the ideal free distribution (IFD) where differences between phenotypes other than those involved in direct competition for resources are considered. We show that these post‐acquisitional differences can have a dramatic impact on the predicted distributions of individuals. 2 Specifically, we predict that, when the relative abilities of phenotypes are independent of location, there will be a continuum of mixed evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) distributions (where all phenotypes are present in all patches). 3 When the relative strengths of the post‐acquisitional trait in the two phenotypes differ between patches, however, we predict only a single ESS at equilibrium. Further, this distribution may be fully or partially segregated (with the distribution of at least one phenotype being spatially restricted) but it will never be mixed. 4 Our results for post‐acquisitional traits mirror those of Parker (1982) for direct competitive traits. This comparison illustrates that it does not matter whether individual differences are expressed before or after competition for resources, they will still exert considerable influence on the distribution of the individuals concerned.